This site is a work in progress and has not been widely shared. Content may contain errors. Feedback is welcome.
This site is undergoing review. Some annotations were human-generated, some AI-generated — all are being verified.
Back to papers

ChatGPT Decreases Idea Diversity in Brainstorming

Nave, Meincke, Terwiesch

20241 citations
LLM / Generative AIAugmentationCreativity
Abstract

Lee and Chung explore how ChatGPT augments human creativity in brainstorming. In a series of experiments, they randomized participants to complete a range of creative challenges, either with or without the help of ChatGPT. These challenges included tasks such as coming up with gift ideas, designing toys from various everyday objects, and repurposing household items. Each participant submitted one idea, which external evaluators rated on multiple creativity dimensions, including innovativeness and usefulness. Across tasks, instructing participants to use ChatGPT enhanced the average creativity of ideas, outperforming web searches and unaided human intuition, with creativity measured as the average of aggregated scores of originality (original, innovative, creative) and appropriateness (practical, effective, useful). These results strengthen the empirical evidence for the effectiveness of LLMs in idea generation, contributing to a rapidly growing literature. However, as we further demonstrate analytically, reliance on ChatGPT for idea generation comes with a significant tradeoff: while enhancing individual ideas' creativity, it reduces the diversity of ideas in a pool of ideas—a critical element for effective brainstorming.

Notes
Nature Human Behaviour, pp. 1-3