This site is a work in progress and has not been widely shared. Content may contain errors. Feedback is welcome.
This site is undergoing review. Some annotations were human-generated, some AI-generated — all are being verified.
Back to datasets

Choi-Monahan-Schwarcz Legal AI

Lawyering in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

AI-focusedPublicWorker-side
Visit Dataset
Specific Type
Experimental AI usage evidence
Dataset Type
Cross-sectional
Institution
University of Southern California; University of Minnesota
Institution Type
Academia
Level of Focus
Individual
Most Granular Level
Individual law student level
Perspective
Worker-side
Time Coverage
2023
Frequency
One-time experiment
Sample Size
60 law students
Geographic Detail
National (US)
Occupational Classification
Law students/Legal professionals
Industrial Classification
Legal services
Other Classification
Skill level; task type
Key Variables
Task completion time; work quality; productivity; satisfaction ratings
AI/Tech Tracking
GPT-4 usage in legal analysis tasks
Access Details
Available from authors
Notes
AI assistance improved speed consistently but quality improvements were uneven; equalizing effect on performance